Search "user:awesomer"

it is a wrapper around sites by other people who have done all the work (content) already, plus it provides a Foobook connect button. Acts as if it was part of Internet Chess Club which it is not. On …

https://www.iccf.com/Message.aspx?message=225 may be of interest to anyone. Im out.

#15 a) losing a game because of a lot of small mistakes made because of a misunderstanding of the position is a different thing than b) losing it because of one big blunder. Most games lost by strong …

engines (by doing error checking) add more math and remove some mystery from chess. That is why many people dont like. That is ok, they can play without engines. But forcing others to deny the math (i…

LOL #12 keep making cheap jokes and inventing things i never said about OTB chess. The true reason why you and other patzers dont like engines in correspodence chess is that you will never again win a…

#8 All serious corr servers allow engines, when will lichess?

#1 fully agree #2 What engines have taken away from chess is obvious blunders. Still the player with good ideas wins more often. These ideas are not found by engines but they can be error checked usin…

#9 agree. Also it is helpful information, i didnt knew that. This is a good setting, because it is nonsense to call a move a blunder or even a mistake when it is still completely won after that move.

#23 nice to hear :-)

#22 Scid( vs PC?) could do that but it has been removed! it has been reported somewhere in the buglist but some developer tagged it as invalid :-/ Also the removal of the repertoire editor was unneces…