This isn't a game analysis question but more of a high level question.
Sometimes, stockfish tells me I blunder (and go from winning to losing) when I try to force the position into an endgame that I (erroneously) thought was winning. However, I end up converting the (theoretically lost) position. When I analyze further with stockfish, stockfish is always right but its moves are hard to find. However, my opponents are rarely playing as well as stockfish, so should I try to play for moves (that stockfish says are bad) that seem to be winning at my current level but objectively bad, or should I try to avoid them. And on the topic of stockfish, how can I develop a better sense as to who is for choice in those 0.0% positions? I'm playing to improve at chess, not to win as many games as I can.
Sometimes, stockfish tells me I blunder (and go from winning to losing) when I try to force the position into an endgame that I (erroneously) thought was winning. However, I end up converting the (theoretically lost) position. When I analyze further with stockfish, stockfish is always right but its moves are hard to find. However, my opponents are rarely playing as well as stockfish, so should I try to play for moves (that stockfish says are bad) that seem to be winning at my current level but objectively bad, or should I try to avoid them. And on the topic of stockfish, how can I develop a better sense as to who is for choice in those 0.0% positions? I'm playing to improve at chess, not to win as many games as I can.