Many people (atheists) who don't believe in God won't accept evidence. Thankfully, there are many other options that also lead back to God. One is the moral argument.
God is THE standard for what is good, and what is Right.
If you assume there is such a thing as good, then don't you assume there's such a thing as evil? And vice versa? When you assume there’s good and evil, don't you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil? But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that’s Who you’re trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there’s no moral Law Giver, there’s no moral law. If there’s no moral law, there’s no good. If there’s no good, there’s no evil. What is your question?
God is THE standard for what is good, and what is Right.
If you assume there is such a thing as good, then don't you assume there's such a thing as evil? And vice versa? When you assume there’s good and evil, don't you assume there’s such a thing as a moral law on the basis of which to differentiate between good and evil? But if you assume a moral law, you must posit a moral Law Giver, but that’s Who you’re trying to disprove and not prove. Because if there’s no moral Law Giver, there’s no moral law. If there’s no moral law, there’s no good. If there’s no good, there’s no evil. What is your question?