lichess.org
Donate

Breaking the Silence

"However, in our opinion, both US Chess and STLCC have failed to demonstrate an important aspect of accountability – a willingness to acknowledge and address past shortcomings. We do not think that reconciliation will be possible without this acknowledgement."

From US Chess final statement:
"First, as a result of the investigation, the Executive Board has voted to both ratify the
resignation of GM Ramirez and permanently ban GM Ramirez from being a US Chess member."
I remember when legal matters were between the individual and the court system, instead of the individual and every single other person and organization on the planet.

We are turning into a species of blank, soulless mutually-policing robots, and everyone is too flat-out dumb to understand why life today is so awful compared to how it used to be.
<Comment deleted by user>
@juoksentelisinkohan said in #24:
> for one instance, this would be a dangerous reply by Lichess. but as we know... this guy has been accused by multiple women, multiple times. as a result, i think we can forget about the "innocent until proven guilty" thing... in that time, it might happen even more.

"Innocent until proven guilty" is a really important principle, since not following it would empower false accusations. I think that organisations' responsibility is assisting alleged victims with law advice and prove obtention. Protection against alleged criminals by reasonable means is important, too. Discouraging crimes by recording rooms (useful for proof) would be great, too. With all of what I said, I believe that any organisation would be taking enough responsibility.

Banning accused people is not the way to go, but rather to keep an eye on them. Anyway, it's not that bad to just ban alleged criminals when there is some proof, because responsibilities if the alleged criminal were found innocent would be on the accusation party.
This is really mostly a matter of police and the courts. It's simply a crime, this matter has nothing at all to do with the game of chess.

It's not really something the US Chess Federation or Saint Louis Chess Club need to speak up about. Banning them for life seems the appropriate measure. It's not their duty to slander the person, they are not the police, they are not the court, they can't decide about their guilt. They are not the press either, so they don't need to speculate in public either. Banning someone and cooperating with the police is really all an organisation like that can reasonably do.
Wild. Thank you to Jennifer and Greg Shahade. I wonder if they remember me from St. Louis. Thank you, Lichess. Many others should be thanked, too.

This is why older women were valued as chaperones.

I'm a couple hours from STL and used to work with Danny Rensch at Chess.com. I just checked the internet. Danny and many other famous chess people know a man who 'sexually assaulted' me on the sidewalk down the street from the St. Louis Club. It was 2016. Here's the short story.

I was talking with several people outside the St. Louis Chess Club after a round of the Sinquefield Cup. After a while, there were only 2 of us. We were talking about chess players, chess stuff. He mentioned he was divorced, so I gave him my stock answer: "I haven't had a date since 2008 and that will never change." That's the truth, so I don't mind saying it. We continued talking professional-like. The Club closed, and we began walking on the sidewalk towards our hotels. Just as we were about to part ways, he lunged at me, I leaned back and turned my head, and he kissed me on the cheek.

Keep in mind we were in public, but no one seemed to notice.

I said, "What are you doing? I told you!" And I cursed as I walked away, wondering if he was more a dork or a jerk. I was 55 then, and he was a bit older, old enough to know better, let's be clear about that. He had not shown any special interest in me, so I was quite surprised by his actions.

I was troubled all night by it. It's a violation of my body from essentially a total stranger. (Word to the wise: do not touch people, except to shake hands.)

I knew I could call the police, but that would stress me out, embarrass the Club, and probably ruin his life in chess, which was most of his life, I gathered. Lots of people knew him. I decided to pretend nothing had happened, if I saw him again.

The next day, the Club was packed and I suddenly found myself face-to-face with him.
I said, "Hello."
He said, "Kiss." He was doubling down on being a jerk.
I said, "I can't talk to you anymore."

That was the last time I saw him. For a year, I wondered if I should report him, because if he's so brazen with an older women like me, what could he possibly get away with around inexperienced younger women and girls at his club, at events? Was I letting my mind run wild with what he may be capable of? I looked up Missouri laws, but I didn't ever file a complaint. This is the first time I have mentioned it.

As I said, this rude person is well-known in American chess and known somewhat internationally, too. I decided I didn't want to ruin his life, because I don't know if he's always a jerk or a jerk just with me. FYI, another man at the STL Club called me "so non-threatening," which is a good thing, but perhaps I look too much like someone who will forgive an offense. What if that's the first time he lost his mind trying to kiss a woman he just met? Should he be arrested and charged and be forced out of chess? If I write his name here, the latter could happen.

When should touching complaints/assaults be reported to law enforcement and when to professional organizations? I don't have the answers, but again I applaud those who speak up and remind people that it's a best practice to keep your hands to yourself.

Lastly, if you've read this far, a note to my special friends Danny Rensch and Erik Allebest. I should have said this years ago, but now will have to do. No one else will tell you, apparently. Please stop making sexual references in your ads and broadcasts, like the recent ad about the timer. I find them embarrassing and unhelpful in light of the present topic. I hope you take note of this.
What the Lichess article fails to explain is what (they think) would or should have been an APPROPRIATE response by US Chess and Saint Louis Chess club to these allegations? In other words: what would Lichess expect these organisations to have done or to do now, in order not to cease / resume collaboration with them?
Extremely proud of Lichess taking a strong stand here.

For people asking why the victims didn't report what had happened. There are lots of reasons, and the fact that it's so hard to report is one of the reasons why sexual assault is such a big problem. Here's a couple of explainers that google brings up:

jacksonhealth.org/blog/2018-01-25-five-reasons-sexual-assault/
happiful.com/why-are-96-of-women-not-reporting-sexual-harassment

Also worth pointing out that it would be totally ridiculous and wreckless for chess organisations to only react once somebody is found guilty of a crime. Almost no organisation does that, it's really bad safeguarding practice.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.